I don’t know how many of you still read this, but…there’s an article in the BBC news about a monkey who fed himself with a robotic arm via electrodes in his brain. Similar to other examples we’ve looked at such as the guy with the third arm, and a paralyzed person moving a cursor on a computer screen with his brain, but the article seems excited about it so perhaps it’s new in some way not fully explained.
One more viddie from the same guy who did the previous video and The Machine is Us/ing us
If you still read this blog, how true does this ring?
And of course it is awesome.
Forget the three foot nose. That’s nothing. Try an out of body experience.
Out-of-body experience recreated
Experts have found a way to trigger an out-of-body experience in volunteers.
Two teams used virtual reality goggles to con the brain into thinking the body was located elsewhere.
The visual illusion plus the feel of their real bodies being touched made volunteers sense that they had moved outside of their physical bodies.
…Their work suggests a disconnection between the brain circuits that process visual and touch sensory information may thus be responsible for some OBEs.
Through these goggles, the volunteers could see a camera view of their own back - a three-dimensional “virtual own body” that appeared to be standing in front of them.When the researchers stroked the back of the volunteer with a pen, the volunteer could see their virtual back being stroked either simultaneously or with a time lag.
The volunteers reported that the sensation seemed to be caused by the pen on their virtual back, rather than their real back, making them feel as if the virtual body was their own rather than a hologram.
Volunteers
Even when the camera was switched to film the back of a mannequin being stroked rather than their own back, the volunteers still reported feeling as if the virtual mannequin body was their own.
And when the researchers switched off the goggles, guided the volunteers back a few paces, and then asked them to walk back to where they had been standing, the volunteers overshot the target, returning nearer to the position of their “virtual self”.
Dr Henrik Ehrsson, who led the UCL research, used a similar set-up in his tests and found volunteers had a physiological response - increased skin sweating - when they felt their virtual self was being threatened - appearing to be hit with a hammer.
Dr Ehrsson said: “This experiment suggests that the first-person visual perspective is critically important for the in-body experience. In other words, we feel that our self is located where the eyes are.”
10 points to anyone who can tell me what Clark would say about this experiment.
This article at the Washington Post.
His Heart Whirs Anew
Peter Houghton Has a Titanium Ticker. He’s Not Sure How to Feel About That.Peter Houghton is grateful for his artificial heart. After all, it has saved his life.
He’s just a little wistful about emotions.
He wishes he could feel them like he used to.
And I’m not being sarcastic.
BBC News: ‘Sarcasm’ brain areas discovered
‘Sarcasm’ brain areas discovered
The scientists pinpointed three important brain areas Scientists say they have located the parts of the brain that comprehend sarcasm - honestly.
By comparing healthy people and those with damage to different parts of the brain, they found the front of the brain was key to understanding sarcasm.
Damage to any of three different areas could render individuals unable to understand sarcastic comments.
…Dr Shamay-Tsoory said this fitted with what is already known about the anatomy of the brain.
She said language areas on the left hand side of the brain interpret the literal meaning of words and the frontal lobes and the right side of the brain understand the social and emotional context.
An area called the right ventromedial prefrontal cortex then integrates the literal meaning with the social/emotional context, which will reveal any sarcasm.
“A lesion in each region in the network can impair sarcasm, because if someone has a problem understanding a social situation, he or she may fail to understand the literal language,” she said.
There’s a huge article in this week’s NYT Sunday Magazine on Social Robots!
They link to a bunch of videos of some of MIT’s fancy new robots, including Leo, who is pretty freakin awesome.
Read this excellent article on the current status of packet inspection on the Internet. The technology they have available to get rid of net neutrality is quite powerful, and really really scary.
Deep packet inspection meets ‘Net neutrality