October 2006

Human Instinct

 

The question of whether or not a machine has the ability to think depends on the definition of thinking, like Turing stated in his article. If thinking is being able to imitate actions, then perhaps a machine could be a thinking thing if it could be programmed to replicate every action. Yet there is a part of humans that I do not believe could be programmed into a machine.

A human being is born with instincts. Many actions that a human being makes are based on instinct, something that a person does not think about or does unconsciously. While a machine could be programmed to do certain things in certain situations, it would not be possible to program a machine to do something, you can say, with out thinking. How would someone be able to make a program to react without thinking? It would be impossible. For example, the example given in class about how a human being laughs. This is done without thinking it’s just a natural reaction.

A machine could be programmed to do a variety of things in a given situation, and analyze each one, yet the machine could not be programmed to do something based on instinct, or what it feels is right because these are things that come from nature. A person does not choose to react or feel a certain way in certain situations, they are just instinctual things. These are decisions made without reason. Perhaps reason could be programmed into a machine, but how could a machine be programmed to not think or do what feels right because feelings and instincts come from nature and are not programmable. I even agree that a machine could be programmed to distinguished between feelings, and be able to identify them based on human actions and expressions, yet the machine itself would not be feeling. Because of feeling, which comes from instinct, a machine would never be able to completely imitate a human being.

Philosophy

Comments (5)

Permalink

More on Can Machines Think

Philosophy

Comments (1)

Permalink

Heidegger Open Thread

Philosophy
Technology
Heidegger

Comments (0)

Permalink

Is Gehlen Right?

Philosophy

Comments (2)

Permalink

Gehlen and Philosophical Anthropology (Open Thread)

Philosophy
Technology
Man
Nature
Gehlen

Comments (4)

Permalink

Notes on the Midterm

Course stuff

Comments (0)

Permalink

Balance

Philosophy
Videos

Comments (2)

Permalink

Evolution: Is it obsolete?

Philosophy
Man
Nature

Comments (6)

Permalink

“Great Robot Race”

Philosophy

Comments (4)

Permalink

Anthropomorphism

Philosophy
Technology
Videos
Man
Obsolescence

Comments (2)

Permalink

Reminder

Course stuff

Comments (0)

Permalink

Dawkins on the Colbert Report

Philosophy
God
Science
Computers
Design
Videos

Comments (5)

Permalink

Human dependability on Machines..

Philosophy

Comments (3)

Permalink

Frogs…reborn

Philosophy

Comments (0)

Permalink

Announcements

Course stuff

Comments (0)

Permalink

Qrio

Philosophy
Technology
Videos
Robots

Comments (5)

Permalink

Computer Science and Anthropomorphism

Philosophy

Comments (7)

Permalink

Debate Afterthoughts

Philosophy

Comments (6)

Permalink

How hard did Descartes work on Meditations?

Descartes
Philosophy

Comments (14)

Permalink

Drum Machines Have No Souls

Philosophy

Comments (15)

Permalink